1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary content



Latino Daily News

Friday January 14, 2011

Human Rights Watch:  Urges Legislatures to Reject Marked Birth Certificate Initiative

State legislatures in the United States should reject a proposal to mark birth certificates of US citizens on the basis of their parents’ immigration status, which would violate the internationally protected right to equal protection, Human Rights Watch said today.

The proposal made on January 5, 2011, by the group State Legislators for Legal Immigration, calls for states to enact laws to make a distinction among children who are US citizens when issuing birth certificates. With approval from the US Congress, states would be able to mark the birth certificates of children born in the US to parents who are not citizens or not entitled to live permanently in the United States differently than the birth certificates of other children who are US citizens.

“International law, as well as US law, requires governments to guarantee equal treatment under the law,” said Alison Parker, US program director at Human Rights Watch. “This invidious proposal seeks to thwart that cherished right.”

Under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, every person born in the United States is entitled to US citizenship. The proposal made on January 5 does not attempt to alter the citizenship status of children born in the US of non-citizen parents. It instead proposes legislation that would allow state governments to differentiate these US citizens from other US citizens through markings on state-issued birth certificates.

Although the proposed model statute claims not to confer any particular benefit or penalty on the basis of the different markings, differentiating citizens on the basis of their parents’ immigration status would inevitably result in discriminatory treatment, Human Rights Watch said.

“Equal protection under law is a cornerstone of US and international law,” Human Rights Watch says. “States should reject this proposal as abhorrent to US values.”